Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130130
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 58.4
39% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 57.2
8% 57.7 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.27 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.6
7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 19 64 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 75.7
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Dark-1600 Dark-1600 12GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.9
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 22" 1280 720 ACI22AA ASUS VW224
Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback