Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RG1M
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 196 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 543 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 7.1 5% 23.6 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 11.6 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 60 65 61 58 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 416 Write 105 Mixed 138 SusWrite 61.3 39% 180 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 15.9 65% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 27.3 DQ Mixed 46.7 47% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 59%
Intenso SSD 240GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 100GB free Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 55 71 74 69 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 426 Write 372 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 119 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 0.8 38% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 43.6 73% 139 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 23.7 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17.3"	1280 720	LGD046C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X7843 MD99557 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	4x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	1x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	1x
WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GBWDCBench 93%, 43,498 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369