_____________________________ _______________

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System_____________________________ _______________  (all builds)
Motherboard________ __________________
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 06:24
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 843
80% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,264
78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Device(48DA 3806) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 99.2
86% 99.9 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 75.8
77% 96.9 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 361
Mixed 156
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 16.9
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 35.4
28% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
620GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 174 176 172 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 56.5
Write 101
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 172
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 19.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 23.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 23% 31 103 9 144 24" 1920 1080 AUS24A3 MG248
Typical _______________ Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

System: _____________________________ _______________

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback