Shanghai ZXE CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemShanghai ZXE CRB  (all builds)
MotherboardShanghai HX002ED0
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6580@2.5GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 34
2-Core 63
34% 52 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 192
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C8) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 13.7
12% 12.6 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 14.3
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 321 216 197 186 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 413
Write 400
Mixed 322
SusWrite 248
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 34.5
110% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 257
192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
485GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 828 854 852 864 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 888
Write 895
Mixed 918
SusWrite 847
200% 887 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 35.9
116% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 284
210% 279 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 136%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF PNY Inc. 8GBU2X04JGGG39-12- 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 3R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 13% 79 51 5 75 23" 1920 1080 HPN3543 HP 23f
Typical ZXE CRB Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Shanghai ZXE CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback