Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '21 at 20:42
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 280 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 737 80% 635 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7168 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 79.4 70% 86.1 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 70.9 65% 80.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 937 305 146 158 176 182 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 1,171 Write 788 Mixed 842 SusWrite 317 174% 779 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 65 222% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 480 DQ Write 824 DQ Mixed 573 457% 626 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 575GB free Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2012 1719 1712 1724 1710 1703 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 1980 Write 2,107 Mixed 1,742 SusWrite 1,763 428% 1,898 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 69.2 237% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,228 DQ Write 979 DQ Mixed 1119 833% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 23.3 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 28.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	120	15.5"	1280 720	BOE08FB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	456x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	248x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	205x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16