Lenovo 255544U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 255544U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 13:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 502
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 790 MHz, MLim: 412 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 211 220 222 220 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 250
Write 160
Mixed 245
SusWrite 192
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 10.1
44% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.3
DQ Write 7.4
DQ Mixed 3.4
8% 17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
452GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 136 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 142
Write 139
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 138
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AXIOM MEMORY Kingston 9905471-055.A00LF MEMORY Kingston 9905471-055.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 2R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 18% 44 15 7 60 27" 2560 1440 RZR1401 RZ39-0276
Typical 255544U Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 255544U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback