ZET WARD H102

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	ZET WARD H102 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 89.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 263 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 858 84% 690 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 2503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.9% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 118 Parallax 122 106% 123 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 102 Splatting 88.8 89% 112 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 483 485 476 352 350 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 489 Mixed 453 SusWrite 437 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 55.1 181% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 355 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 130%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	2.79% Terrible	Read 8.4 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.3 6% 5.05 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 19 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 2R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	26%	42	110	7	60	19"	1280 1024	SNYB400 SDM-E96D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WARD H102 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: ZET WARD H102

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	13x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	12x
RTX 4060-TiNvidia $385Bench 145%, 17,450 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1x
AS2280P4U 256GBApacerBench 188%, 92 samples	1x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	11x
R7S48G2606U2S Adata DDR4 3200 R7S48G2606U2S Adata DDR4 3200 32GBAMDBench 85%, 2 samples	1x
DDR4 3200 4x8GBAdataBench 91%, 25,190 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16