Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 185
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 362
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 77.8
48% 66 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 44.2
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/350G 350GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 128 213 91 90 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 428
Write 364
Mixed 324
SusWrite 171
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 18.1
109% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 31.6
80% 163 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
50GB free
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 224 214 218 207 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.1% Good
Read 204
Write 211
Mixed 158
SusWrite 220
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 24.9
107% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 112
104% 160 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 121 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 3R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 14% 77 109 6 60 7.2" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback