Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 950
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 114
Parallax 120
104% 120 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 108
Splatting 98.8
92% 115 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 129 140 153 190 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,919
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 344
286% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 70.2
230% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 920
651% 821 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 184%
Great: 305%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$94
69GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 121 104 113 118 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 108
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 91.4
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 100%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 98.8
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 99%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
178GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 54 53 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
30% Poor
Read 80
Write 78.9
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 52.3
88% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30%
Great: 52%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
133GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 54 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 122
Write 103
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 52.1
110% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 DELA0D1 Dell S2716DG
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback