Panasonic CF-SX2A15CS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-SX2A15CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSX2-3
Memory1.6 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 13:14
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 163
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 83.3
24% 154 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.17 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2575GSX 250GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 63 68 64 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 67.4
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 63.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 52GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 15.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-SX2A15CS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-SX2A15CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback