Panasonic CF-SX2A15CS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-SX2A15CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSX2-3
Memory1.5 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 13:11
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 162
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 208
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.07 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2575GSX 250GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 48 56 59 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 32.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 48.4
25% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 52GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-SX2A15CS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-SX2A15CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback