PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Positivo POS-PIH81DI (all builds) |
Motherboard | Positivo POS-PIH81DI |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141208 |
Uptime | 17.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 31 '21 at 01:15 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1365) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 83 125 103 143 125 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.9%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 144 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | AOC2402 24G2W1G4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples | 49x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 32x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 36x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $107 |