MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 867
87% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 187
Parallax 193
140% 184 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 176
Splatting 123
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 478 174 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 473
Mixed 400
SusWrite 263
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 40.8
151% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 302
222% 288 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
243GB free
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 156 132 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 483
Mixed 386
SusWrite 254
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41
153% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 273
208% 277 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94%
Great: 95%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
224GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 359 359 359 360 359 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 358
Mixed 319
SusWrite 359
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 42.5
151% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 194
165% 241 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 98 92 100 104 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 96.9
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 144
Write 123
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 130
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 35.2
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 36.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F45 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $672
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback