Lenovo 2522WDM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2522WDM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2522WDM
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime108.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 60.2
35% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 165
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1
0% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 85 81 77 89 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 81.2
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-BE 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1066, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback