Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 08 '17 at 20:17
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 832
90% 713 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
CLim: 1636 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 35.4
34% 38.3 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 36.7
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 488
Write 220
Mixed 275
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 20.6
131% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 47.6
86% 172 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
2TB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 146
Write 121
Mixed 106
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
884GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 85.4
Write 77.8
Mixed 65.2
57% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.43
104% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
730GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 104
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.46
112% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3400C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3400C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB
3165, 3165, 3165, 3165 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 33.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback