Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory154.4 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 167
56% 101 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 635
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 2533
157% 2533 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
89GB free
Firmware: 57MS4109 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 1165 1175 1174 1174 1173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,014
Mixed 854
SusWrite 1,168
245% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 610
478% 663 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 204%
Great: 207%
LSI MegaSR 999GB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 15 17 28 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 94%
LSI Logical Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 15 7.3 5.8 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 91.2
Write 14.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 13
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7CMR4A-H 10x16GB
10 of 16 slots used
160GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 38.4
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback