Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory154.1 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 651
57% 483 Pts
64-Core 2,539
157% 2,539 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
89GB free
Firmware: 57MS4109 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 1170 1176 1151 1175 1174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1269
Write 908
Mixed 840
SusWrite 1169
235% 1,047 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 43.7
160% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 608
476% 662 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 202%
Great: 207%
LSI MegaSR 999GB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 16 17 24 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 94%
LSI Logical Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 23.8
Mixed 27.2
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7CMR4A-H 10x16GB
10 of 16 slots used
160GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 40.1
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback