59103817 15360993

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System59103817 15360993  (all builds)
Motherboard67183097 50680324
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 856
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 1367
85% 1367 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 139
Parallax 182
110% 152 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 81 82 81 76 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 374
Write 347
Mixed 305
SusWrite 108
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 25.4
102% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 247
201% 282 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 90%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
123GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 131 130 120 112 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 910
Write 1,288
Mixed 824
SusWrite 242
184% 816 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 34.4
128% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 831
620% 812 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 126%
Great: 305%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
595GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 181 180 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 175
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 179
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
WD WD20EZEX-00EYGA0 2TB
594GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 144 143 145 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 117
Write 140
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 144
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15360993 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: 59103817 15360993

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $951
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback