Medion X6816

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion X6816  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion X6816
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 157
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 377
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 121 126 129 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 352
Write 148
Mixed 199
SusWrite 127
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 22
79% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 158
122% 168 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD02DC
Typical X6816 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion X6816

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback