Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 156% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 173% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 143 2-Core 281 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 908 70% 622 Pts	64-Core 1,538 95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	200% Outstanding	Lighting 292 Reflection 244 Parallax 318 238% 284 fps	MRender 324 Gravity 245 Splatting 184 198% 251 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 503 465 497 490 505 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 763 Write 652 Mixed 588 SusWrite 492 140% 624 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 20.2 71% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 474 DQ Write 440 DQ Mixed 471 350% 462 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 393%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1846 1874 1910 1687 1608 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 1,860 Write 1,655 Mixed 1,382 SusWrite 1,783 376% 1,670 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 63.5 214% 76.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,294 DQ Write 1138 DQ Mixed 1,191 900% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 431%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 498GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 92 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 90.1 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 91.3 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C17 4x8GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3700 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 32.1 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 38.5 SC Mixed 24 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	360	24.5"	1280 720	MSI3BB0 MSI NXG253R

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	964x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	286x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	107x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	139x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $810

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16