Asus P5K SE/EPU

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 68.8 40% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 136 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 7.1 5% 5.73 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 6.6 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200828 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 27 25 158 63 29 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.3% Below average	Read 208 Write 210 Mixed 182 SusWrite 51.3 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 13 81% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.1 DQ Write 68.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 22% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 166%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 150GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 59 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 78.2 Write 72.1 Mixed 57.9 SusWrite 58.1 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 16GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 75 90 75 91 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 59.8 Write 57.2 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 81.6 46% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 67%
Samsung HD753LI 750GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 57GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 71.7 Write 44.8 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 85.7 47% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 45%
Jmicron Tech 500GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 463GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 29.9 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 2.5 16% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 65%
Jmicron Tech 500GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 23 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 19.8 Mixed 15.1 SusWrite 23 14% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 65%
Seagate USB 640GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 60.7 Write 58.8 Mixed 35.6 64% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 38%
Dell USB Portable HDD 1TB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 61GB free, PID 9013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 93 80 87 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 85.6 Write 76.7 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 90 99% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	8x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	41x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16