Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 04:59
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 778
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 82.7
46% 67.3 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 69.2
54% 64.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 138 148 152 146 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 314
Write 210
Mixed 236
SusWrite 147
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 38
138% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 169
133% 183 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
125GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 85 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51% Above average
Read 92
Write 88.4
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 85.5
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
11GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.9 5.2 5.2 5.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 12.6
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 4.6
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
95% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 39.5
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 120%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 26.1" 1280 720 DTV0000 DTV
Typical X370 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback