Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7000 APU (2014 M.Ka) 246 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Memory 16.8 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 57.4 21% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 58.2 8-Core 59.2 8% 58.7 Pts	64-Core 57 4% 57 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 430 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 5111) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.7 2% 2.63 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ssd 512GB 4,609 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 177 268 125 85 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 289 Write 109 Mixed 268 SusWrite 167 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 27.7 100% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 146 114% 156 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 345 12% 345 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	LEN40B0

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16