PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacBookPro9,2 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-6F01561E16C75D06 |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '21 at 14:55 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
3.09%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 302 298 294 293 289 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
381GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 61 62 59 61 MB/s
|
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | ACI24C3 ASUS VN247 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 377x |
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 457x |
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $750Bench 240%, 46,082 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $131 |