Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 14:07
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 271
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 767
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 8830) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2355 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 36
88% 36 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,148
Write 3,245
Mixed 677
383% 1690 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 50.8
182% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 735
569% 775 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
61GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 382 382 383 382 381 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 443
Mixed 433
SusWrite 389
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 50.7
168% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
78GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 446 446 448 445 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 443
SusWrite 444
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 48.7
159% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.5
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F83 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,527
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback