QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory20 GB free of 22 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 1874 x 977 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 133
56% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 536
47% 401 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 159GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 76 74 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
Read 198
Write 83.2
Mixed 115
SusWrite 75.7
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 5.6
977% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 22GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 6144 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 33% 12 44 3 32 0" 1874 977
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback