Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive385% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 863
90% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 140
Parallax 300
116% 194 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 144
Splatting 172
148% 184 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2847 2007 1981 1994 1985 2055 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2,864
Write 3,147
Mixed 3,020
SusWrite 2,145
630% 2,794 MB/s
4K Read 84.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 94.2
312% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 714
591% 875 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 385%
Great: 488%
T-force 1TB 1TB
224GB free
Firmware: 02K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 181 97 96 365 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 494
Write 234
Mixed 223
SusWrite 216
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 44.9
149% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 138
126% 195 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
286GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 463 464 465 463 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 465
Mixed 412
SusWrite 463
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 55.3
182% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 222
167% 225 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
216GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2369 2372 2373 1847 382 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 1691
Mixed 1876
SusWrite 1,606
402% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 79.9
255% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,546
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 812
671% 989 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 305%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 41.6
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 39.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 VTK2700 GNV27DB
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback