Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive385% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 854
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.30.11.01
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 137
Parallax 305
111% 193 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 142
Splatting 170
146% 181 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
537GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3009 2385 1871 1857 1871 1876 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2,875
Write 3,107
Mixed 2,956
SusWrite 2,145
625% 2,771 MB/s
4K Read 83.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 94.9
309% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 734
603% 887 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 385%
Great: 488%
T-force 1TB 1TB
224GB free
Firmware: 02K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 178 320 103 129 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 456
Mixed 448
SusWrite 173
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 52.9
169% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 117
110% 175 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
286GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 462 465 465 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 464
Mixed 403
SusWrite 464
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 54.9
180% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 223
168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
251GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 1878 2328 2368 1933 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,220
Write 1,981
Mixed 1,542
SusWrite 1,759
421% 1,875 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 79.6
223% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,555
DQ Write 626
DQ Mixed 813
675% 998 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 316%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39.8
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 VTK2700 GNV27DB
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback