HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 08:30
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 378
49% 371 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
PwrHis(1787 2003) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 3.7
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD07S 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 79 10 44 62 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 216
Write 158
Mixed 196
SusWrite 62.3
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 23.6
92% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 124
103% 147 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
251GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 61
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 68.1
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
351GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 151 153 151 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 96.8
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 150
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
516GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 41.3
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 41.6
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 62%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
226GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 54.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 56.5
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
SanDisk SD8SB8U-256G-100 256GB
140GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 198 195 187 196 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
149% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 208
Mixed 162
SusWrite 195
266% 199 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 16.7
1,392% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 16.9
1,746% 22.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DASKA L-009.A00LF HMT351U6EFR8C-PB DASKA L-009.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 30 29 9 60 24.1" 1536 960 HWP301F HP LA2405x
Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback