Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 04:02
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 122
56% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 384
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 40
32% 40.8 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 29.3
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 346 362 254 269 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 489
Write 411
Mixed 332
SusWrite 285
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 33.9
112% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 190
151% 210 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 108%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
123GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 349 357 375 377 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 488
Write 414
Mixed 319
SusWrite 341
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 34.4
115% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 192
151% 209 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
813GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 205 206 207 209 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 98.6
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 197
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 3.1 3 3.7 3.6 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 13.7
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 3.9
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.2
143% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
7GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.8 6 5.5 6.1 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 4
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.7
10% 9.32 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D18ADS3 Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ BLS4G3D18ADS3 Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ 16GB
933, 800, 933, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 69: 10R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 41% 41 336 269 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR0289 S240HL
History: Score 36: 5R 3G 2B | Score 69: 10R 6G 1B
Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback