Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 13:48
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 624
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 38.8
24% 33.7 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 22.5
21% 26 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 261 242 227 226 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 492
Write 447
Mixed 391
SusWrite 243
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 34.7
123% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 106
90% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 176 168 179 165 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 178
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 172
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0 0 0 0 6.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 9% 34 196 113 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D22 S27F350
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 15: 3R 0G 0B
Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback