Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 05:32
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 324
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,213
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 2,181
135% 2,181 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 164
Reflection 166
Parallax 179
134% 170 fps
Gravity 143
Splatting 122
116% 132 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2088 611 613 595 621 625 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,183
Mixed 1,618
SusWrite 859
401% 1,796 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 66.4
225% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,230
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 329
333% 571 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 254%
Great: 340%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
602GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2241 2224 216 296 277 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 2,166
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 917
321% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 47.3
135% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 282
225% 329 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 168%
Great: 368%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
915GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 461 381 376 365 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 418
Write 447
Mixed 383
SusWrite 399
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 34.4
113% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 175
144% 214 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
450GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 430 412 471 451 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 475
Mixed 406
SusWrite 445
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 89
DQ Mixed 180
147% 218 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
463GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 446 391 403 393 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 472
Mixed 391
SusWrite 416
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 41.5
139% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 167
139% 210 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 128%
ST4000DM005-2DP1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 184 178 175 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 182
Write 98.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 179
169% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 40.9
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 34.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 8R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 49% 39 343 282 144 27" 2560 1440 ACI27A8 ASUS MG278
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback