NEC PC-VK23TNWCR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemNEC PC-VK23TNWCR  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC Suigetsu-S2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
BGA1356, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 144
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 234
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 609A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.6 fps
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000L1 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 193 197 200 201 213 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 461
Write 249
Mixed 227
SusWrite 201
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 31.7
129% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 229
189% 275 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback