Lenovo 30D0S70600

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30D0S70600 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 314F
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210629
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2224G 363 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 565 74% 557 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 49.9 Reflection 79.7 Parallax 47.9 41% 59.2 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 66.3 54% 66 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 491GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 988 984 997 1000 991 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 2253 Write 1,815 Mixed 1,916 SusWrite 1,029 393% 1,753 MB/s	4K Read 61.4 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 58.1 238% 84.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,332 DQ Write 1,054 DQ Mixed 1,209 900% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 181GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 68 99 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 126 Write 66.9 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 80.1 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 27.5 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 25.7 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	26.9"	1280 720	BNQ7F47 BenQ SW2700

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 30D0S70600 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Lenovo 30D0S70600

CPU
Xeon E-2224GIntelBench 87%, 363 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples	2x

SSD
Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 380%, 12,579 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 64GBUnknownBench 78%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16