Lenovo 30D0S70600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30D0S70600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 314F
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2224G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 514
71% 528 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 60
46% 61.5 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 59
Splatting 65.1
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,178
Write 1,776
Mixed 1,897
434% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 78.7
258% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,204
898% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
242GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 97.5
Mixed 66.2
67% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 26.9" 1280 720 BNQ7F47 BenQ SW2700
Typical 30D0S70600 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 30D0S70600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback