Lenovo 90L300G2TA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90L300G2TA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 696
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.84
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 87.1
78% 91.6 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 87.7
Splatting 75.8
70% 86.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,957
Write 1,640
Mixed 1,094
346% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67.4
220% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,049
809% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 247%
Seagate ST6000VX0001-1SH17Z 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: VN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 190 191 191 187 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 185
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 189
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
77GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 102
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 6R 8G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 45% 33 264 184 144 31.5" 2560 1440 ACR067E ED323QUR A
History: Score 51: 6R 4G 9B | Score 55: 6R 8G 1B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback