Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX566HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX566HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 09:57
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 296
83% 159 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 736
79% 630 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9510
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5.6
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 768 748 775 778 812 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 1,385
Mixed 1,264
SusWrite 787
297% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 80.7
266% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 744
499% 609 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 231%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 22.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 18
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 6R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 20% 45 68 49 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX566HM Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX566HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback