Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 1,146 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 1139 70% 1139 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 78 82 118 51 127 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 225 Write 91.6 Mixed 114 SusWrite 78.7 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 8 43% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 85.6 DQ Write 22.6 DQ Mixed 23.5 25% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 85%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 274GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 49 54 55 56 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 50.6 Write 53.4 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 53.7 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 820GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 127 129 128 120 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 144 Mixed 105 SusWrite 123 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.6 270% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x31GB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.3 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 0R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	50%	20	82	58	60	0"	1920 1080

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,629x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,231x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	842x
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	484x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	430x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	221x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	364x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $432

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16