Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 06:57
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 219 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 455 61% 455 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 4.6 4% 5.13 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB 4,843 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111B1L SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 357 129 181 130 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,407 Write 537 Mixed 608 SusWrite 226 152% 695 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 28.6 184% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 522 DQ Mixed 320 279% 409 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 157%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 207GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 89 89 91 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 85.8 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 88.2 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 25.7 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 22.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 27: 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
27%	23%	47	26	5	70	0"	1600 900	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,314x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,013x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	958x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	747x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	721x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	296x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16