Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	111.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201231
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 04:31
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Memory 75 1-Core 166 2-Core 327 100% 189 Pts	4-Core 635 8-Core 1,231 111% 933 Pts	64-Core 2,249 139% 2,249 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB; Nvidia RTX 3090 CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 120 Parallax 120 98% 120 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 120 Splatting 120 98% 120 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 1509 1548 1450 1367 1384 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,255 Write 2,198 Mixed 1,343 SusWrite 1,412 404% 1,802 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 55.6 190% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 839 DQ Write 714 DQ Mixed 628 511% 727 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 410%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 74GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 306 246 213 181 204 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 415 Write 394 Mixed 333 SusWrite 258 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 32.7 116% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 139 122% 183 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 80GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 446 439 438 439 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 450 Mixed 442 SusWrite 445 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 49 158% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250 3,023 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 243 161 163 159 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 498 Write 457 Mixed 379 SusWrite 225 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 43.5 144% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 758GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 37.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 38.1 9% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 14.1 46% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 15.3 16% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 99%
SABRENT 4TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 426GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 294 132 58 64 63 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 106%
SABRENT 2TB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 992GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 187 192 162 152 156 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 617GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 89 89 85 89 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 45.6 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 86.6 80% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 45%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 81 81 81 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 81.3 Write 83.1 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 80.3 101% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.8 270% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 50.7 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 32 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 31 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	120	72.3"	1280 720	GSMC0A0 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,169x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	610x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	530x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	483x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	215x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	159x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16