Csl-computer 934

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCsl-computer 934  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 22:49
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 136
2-Core 239
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 843
80% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 31.4
16% 23.4 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 25.7
18% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 110 154 146 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 469
Write 411
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 158
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 18.6
79% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 28.9
81% 166 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 92%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
193GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 609 335 255 258 259 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,421
Write 1,026
Mixed 912
SusWrite 444
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 52.7
210% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 318
388% 675 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 185%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3733 C19 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 22" 1280 720 FUS0747 L22W-6SA
Typical 934 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Csl-computer 934

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback