MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C82
MotherboardMSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 01:47
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 792
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.9% Above average
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 83
Parallax 76.3
69% 81.2 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 0.1
43% 60.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 52 14 54 59 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 206
Write 94.8
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 58.6
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 6.8
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 73.5
73% 117 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 93%
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 136 131 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 371
Write 243
Mixed 230
SusWrite 158
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 23.9
108% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 157
119% 156 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 93%
OSC 256GB 256GB
150GB free
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 239 241 239 241 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 462
Write 240
Mixed 197
SusWrite 239
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 11.6
98% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 64.7
83% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 186 186 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 134
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 184
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 106%
Great: 88%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
37GB free, PID 5678, gpor
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU481-26N1900 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 31.6" 1280 720 LHC0032 ULTRON3257NEW
Typical MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82) Builds (Compare 2,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback