PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HDVP (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200810 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '22 at 12:03 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-10400-$145
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
84% 143 Pts
|
69% 535 Pts
|
58% 858 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
64.7%
Good
|
66% 80 fps
|
63% 81.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$53
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 429 425 418 412 389 MB/s
|
184%
Outstanding
|
217% 968 MB/s
|
233% 80.3 MB/s
|
570% 768 MB/s
|
![]() WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 161 122 157 167 168 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
34% 150 MB/s
|
8% 3.87 MB/s
|
2% 4 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown KD48GU481-26N1900 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.4%
Very good
|
80% 27.9 GB/s
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
63% 63.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30% | 63% | 19 | 103 | 4 | 144 | 24" | 1920 1080 | LHC0236 ULTRON 2460G |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-10500Intel $200Bench 89%, 9,026 samples | 5x |
Core i5-10400Intel $145Bench 86%, 63,113 samples | 4x |
Core i3-10100Intel $125Bench 83%, 28,274 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples | 3x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 28,579 samples | 2x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 373,446 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $490 |