Toshiba Satellite L505

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L505  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration7236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 59.3
31% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 55.6
8-Core 59.9
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 56.3
4% 56.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FF11)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 197 125 198 191 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 156
Write 97.7
Mixed 105
SusWrite 176
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 16.3
56% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 63.9
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 69.2
50% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 98%
USB DISK 126GB
36GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 5.7 4.8 23 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 25
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 11.7
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.1
137% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L505 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L505

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback