HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.6 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '17 at 09:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 561
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 122
107% 132 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H3Q
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 136
Write 128
Mixed 133
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 28.3
82% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 72.3
61% 88 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 116%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1K03
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 119
Mixed 126
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.44
125% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$79
109GB free
Firmware: HPS1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 190
Mixed 177
133% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.72
170% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
507GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 83.8
Mixed 88.7
112% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 45%
ADATA HD710 2TB
364GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 79.4
Write 97.5
Mixed 76.6
111% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.29
53% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback