Dell FS12-TY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell FS12-TY  (all builds)
MotherboardDell FS12-TY
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '17 at 09:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 55
2-Core 114
45% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 324
26% 230 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 297GB
277GB free
Firmware: 1.11
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.2% Very good
Read 597
Write 448
Mixed 432
109% 492 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 6.76
47% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 16.1
42% 88.4 MB/s
Dell PERC 6/i 119GB
108GB free
Firmware: 1.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 132
Write 99.2
Mixed 107
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 6.16
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 12.6
41% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 21.8
29% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 90%
Dell PERC 6/i 59GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.11
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 133
Write 59.5
Mixed 85.5
20% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 14.1
55% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 75.4
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 23.3
30% 53.7 MB/s
Dell PERC 6/i 250GB
230GB free
Firmware: 1.11
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 113
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.61
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FS12-TY Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell FS12-TY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback