Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	40% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 91.4 46% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 91.7 8-Core 92.6 12% 92.1 Pts	64-Core 91.7 6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 4,872 User benchmarks, average bench 4% AMD(1002 0123) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.3.3 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 6.3 3% 4.83 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 5.6 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
JMicron Generic DISK00 320GB 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.14% Terrible	Read 14 Write 14 Mixed 13 SusWrite 17.7 20% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 0.23 MB/s

JMicron Generic DISK01 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.21% Terrible	Read 8 Write 9.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 1.9 9% 6.53 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 1x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.9 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $274

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16