Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 02:56
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 799
80% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 58
Parallax 50.2
50% 56.3 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 47.1
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000L7 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L6QBXW7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 887 795 763 638 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,142
Mixed 848
SusWrite 738
241% 1080 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 54.6
196% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 560
439% 622 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 198%
Great: 241%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2427 2439 2449 2450 2250 1689 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,414
Write 2,285
Mixed 2,236
SusWrite 2284
520% 2,305 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 87.9
282% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 944
707% 943 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 366%
Great: 488%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 235 235 232 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 235
Mixed 101
SusWrite 234
147% 202 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.8
394% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
JMicron Generic DISK00 250GB
232GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 93 95 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 94.3
130% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 157%
JMicron Generic DISK01 250GB
121GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 93 95 93 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 94.1
128% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 31.6
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 4R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 43% 23 314 244 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback