HP 240 G3 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 240 G3 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 220D
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime19 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 100
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 220D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5180
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF36
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 294
Write 103
Mixed 125
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 11.8
31% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 5.3
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 1.6
7% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22
Write 21.7
Mixed 12.7
23% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
74% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G3 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G3 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback