PC Intel Z370

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC Intel Z370  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 299
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 910
88% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 274
Parallax 309
241% 293 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 242
Splatting 180
198% 252 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 283 286 287 290 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 287
Mixed 435
SusWrite 299
132% 609 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 89.2
260% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 652
541% 772 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 195%
Great: 244%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
116GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 342 289 284 279 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 490
Mixed 458
SusWrite 324
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 70.4
236% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
249GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 485 487 489 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 490
Mixed 467
SusWrite 488
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.1
222% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
171GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 150 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 180
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 150
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
93GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 71 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 69.5
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 25.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 28.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 240 27.4" 1280 720 DELA179 Dell AW2721D
Typical Intel Z370 Builds (Compare 1,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: PC Intel Z370

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $649
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback